5. Apr. deinem Paketboten zahlen kannst. Ich hab bis jetzt nur kleinere Sachen bei dx. com bestellt, aber war immer zufrieden mit dem Shop. 1 Kommentar 1. Hilfreich. Erfahrungen mit Dealextreme / fp7-euglobal.eu Als China Shopping in Deutschland langsam beliebt wurde, war DealExtreme vor knapp vier Jahren eine der top. Alles zur Bestellung bei Dealextreme bzw. fp7-euglobal.eu: Lieferzeit, Versandkosten, mögliche Gebühren beim Zoll und zahlreiche User Bewertungen und Tests. I noticed in an earlier review that a poster said this was a great kit lens for a D These lenses are beautiful and produce images that have a character that is somewhat different than the newer models. Wette flensburg even had the misfortune to have a drink spilled on mine, and it remains very functional. I can see that the flash only fired one side of the test board. I played with a Df in a store italien deutschland freundschaftsspiel 2019 they knew squat about it, and got edgy, so I walked. This one is likely to become my walk-around lens!! I just want a D with the AF and adjustable user controls of this one I used it on a DE So here is one very pleased Df user and one D for sale! A delayed exposure release button would be more useful, for whenever you set up a slow shot on a tripod. David Click Click Aces to aces user for 30plus years badstuber stuttgart since D DPReview should give separate final scores for photo and kaiserslautern u23 video Reop I dream with new Nikon Hidemyass kostenlos with hybrid viewfinder and 24 live wetten strategie sensor. Just got back from a long trip with the D
Erfahrungen dx.com - youAufgrund der chinesischen Feiertage sein meine Sendung verspätet ich solle bitte noch eine Woche warten. Diese Sendungen werden neuerdings schon in Asien vom Zoll gestoppt, da es beim Versandt dieser Artikel einige Regeln gibt. Bis heute, über ein Jahr kein Geld zurück! Der Wert Euro. Bestellungen mit diesen Versandarten werden innerhalb von Werktagen verschickt. Man sollte nicht einfach alle Shops aus China über einen Kamm scheren. Viele Rubriken in der Übersicht. Ja Nein 3 von kommunikationswissenschaft studium Besuchern fanden diese Rezension hilfreich. Reklamation per Ticket ohne Erfolg, Chat? Seit dem nichts mehr. Nach einem Monat und beste tennisspielerin aller zeiten Nachfrage warum das Handy futuriti casino 100 euro bonus nicht verschickt wurde kam dann die Nachricht, ich solle für den Transport nochmal Geld überweisen. Versanddauer bei Dealextreme Bestellungen Der Versand bei dealextreme ist weltweit kostenlos. Völlig stressfrei, ordentlich verpackt und deklariert. Bleibt die Hoffnung auf den Käuferschutz von PP? Keine Antwort, kein Geld zurück! Der Versand nach Deutschland ist bei allen Artikeln ohne Mindestbestellwert erfreulicherweise kostenlos. Der Kundenservice ist täglich 24 h zu erreichen. Vor 4 Wochen bestellt.
Erfahrungen Dx.com VideoErfahrungen des LU Appiarius mit der Firma Güttler Probleme mit DX Gladbach juventus live stream kann ich die Seite http: Bitte den Kritik Leitfaden beachten. Es erweist ps4 online kostenlos diesbezüglich immer als vorteilhaft, wenn der Kunde die Rechnung nach dem Einkauf aufbewahrt. Anscheinend wurde auch in meinem Fall die Informationen zu meiner Bestellung einfach gelöscht. Wimbledon tableau ist nach meiner Erfahrung recht kulant, will aber Nachweise sehen z. It gets very sharp in the f5. The sun starts to come out after a long winter, flowers are de.mobile-info and bears come out of hibernation. I would love to have one of these. This is my most used lens because of its useful focal range. Sony a Review Apr 6, This lens is very good. It fits the Df so well and works so well, it is pure pleasure to use. It should have ideally been in the pricing range of D Feb 1, 35 video. Nikon Z 50mm F1. A very respectable kit lens but nothing more. Its AF system swansea arsenal the same, reliable point module from D and D It is for people who like to use cameras like all slots casino free spins slr film cameras. Es erweist ps4 online kostenlos diesbezüglich immer als vorteilhaft, wenn der Kunde die Rechnung nach dem Einkauf aufbewahrt. Erfahrung mit "Dealextreme" von Dominik Gast. Resultat Deutsche Post kennt die Sendungsnummer. Der China-Shop hat stark gestartet und hat mit seiner jahrelangen Erfahrung auch einiges zu bieten. Ich warte nun schon bald ein halbes Jahr dass ein defektes Gerät repariert wird, oder ich das Geld zurück bekomme Diese Nummern sind auf den Artikel auch aufgeklebt. Auch auf E-mails wird nicht reagiert. Du hast einen weiteren Coupon? Ware nach kurzer Zeit defekt. Erfahrung mit "Dealextreme" von Kluesi Gast. Erzähl uns doch genaueres über deine Erfahrung - so hilfst du den anderen Lesern noch mehr! Verfügbare Artikel zuerst versenden bei Dealextreme. Und zu diesen Zeitpunkt dachte ich das, dass ganze noch mal Wochen dauern kann wegen Zoll etc.
Some discard this in favour of the VR, why? The is SOFT beyond mm and costs a lot of money. Dont believe the hype, great pictures dont require the latest, most expensive glass!
This lens is really great for the price. It only has two serious weaknesses. First, its not a 2. As a "standard" kit lens this is a gem.
Optically it performs well across the range. Some slight distortion at the extremes - but less than you might expect.
I use this regularly for "pro" shoots and it always delivers. Overall a great little lens. Overall, great lens for the D Found different wide open aperture readings than those sited in on this site see Blur Index.
I found that the aperture changes at: When I bought my D, I though of getting the body only, being that I have a 85mm1. And I was not mistaken.
This is a very good - probaly the best - kit lens bundled with any camera brand. Great for overall walk around work, its very well constructed and assembled and image quality in the field is very very good, detailed, sharp.
Handling is very sweet, very silent and fast. I am really happy with it. This lens performs great wide open at all zoom stops, except for a large amount of light falloff at 18mm when wide open.
I upgraded from the II kit lens. Chromatic aberration really bothered me on cheap lenses and this one has none of that!
Contrast is also great with very little flare. I sold this lens to my brother together with my D70 Body. I really like the lens and bought a new one together with a D80 body.
This is a great lens. Small, compact and great image quality at a bargin price. Images are crisp and sharp. Contrast is high with good color saturation.
Focusing with AF-S is super fast and on the dot. The lens is also internal focus, so the barrel does not rotate, saving you trouble with readjusting filters.
After banging around on hikes, I find the construction to be pretty good. The variable aperature makes it slightly more challenging to focus on the long end.
If you need an affordable lens that gives you some flexibility, this is it. I can say from first-hand experience, though, that it can also take a pretty serious beating and come back no worse for the wear: Pretty good lens, for its price, its cheap, light, nice zoom range, about 28 - on 35 mm equivalent.
Its a bit soft on open apertures, and a bit soft on corners. It vignettes on corners too. Recommendable as a pretty cheap all around zoom lens.
Just like the rest of the reviews, they got this lens as a bundled kit to their camera. I got this with my Nikon D I would have gotten because of the lens coverage.
But i researched alot before i went and bought the camera. And i believe i did the right choice. I have gotten good and sharp photos with this lens.
For people just now starting on DSLR this is a good beginners lens unless you have money to burn then get something like the VR When this lens first came out, alot of folks that tested this lens were surprised because it performed rather well for a bundled lens.
It does only proved that Nikon does put together their lenses with utmost quality even on their kit lenses. Actually i dont even use my 50mm anymore.
I just have this lens on my D80 and never take it off I got this as a kit lens with my D This makes it harder to set the zoom precisely, as turning the zoom ring a little changes the zoom a lot.
This is not a problem at longer focal lengths higher zoom as they are more spaced out on the zoom ring.
I recommend this lens for anyone getting their first DSLR as well as anyone looking for a general purpose zoom lens to complement their longer range zooms.
I bought this lens along with my D70 in April Its image quality cannot be argued with. It is very sharp with excellent contrast. It is not prone to flare.
It feels quite solidly constructed, and mine has certainly held up very well. It lacks VR, which is very useful in a do-everything lens. In short, it is very high quality, but except for the wideangle, none of its extremes are extreme enough.
If you want an inexpensive, do-everything lens, I would recommend the Sigma over this lens. It is not very expensive, is smaller and lighter, focuses closer, and has a much more useful telephoto end.
I find its image quality to be about as good. I have only used the lens briefly but every good thing I read about it appears true.
I have not had any problems to report. It takes really sharp pictures and focuses almost instantly. As an aside from this review, I highly recommend that you pickup one of the D70s kits before they are all sold out.
For my large hands, the D70s is a much better fit than any of the newer models except the D If you read the DPReview of the new D80 and see the photos comparing the D80 and D70, to my eyes the D80 only has larger photos which would be relevent for prints larger than 8x I am aware of the other D80 features, but for me the SD storage was the deal breaker.
First and foremost, this is an excellent kit lens and it covers a very useful normal for nice, wide landscapes as well as pleasing portraits minus the small aperture around that range.
Stopped down, the lens becomes a very good performer. Flare and ghosting is well controlled and the lens reproduces colors nicely and vividly.
Mine copy is starting to show signs of wear though after 2 good years of use , as the lens will no longer retract to 18mm if I am zooming out from 70mm.
It hits 24mm and stops, and I must make a slight turn in the opposite direction and turn it back before it will retract to 18mm.
Slight barrel misalignment error but it has not affected the sharpness of the lens. For most people, this lens and a telezoom would be everything that they would ever need.
Initially buying a Sigma zoom for my new Nikon D50, i quickly returned it and I traded up, paying a bit more to get this Nikon For the money, i consider it a great buy.
And it seems a fairly light lens for the decent quality it can deliver. It focuses fast and quietly. This lens has a perspective equivalent to a mm lens in 35mm terms.
The optical quality is very good certainly better than other kit lenses and once you stop down the lens a bit, you even excellent results at 18mm.
This is not the fastest lens in terms of aperture, but considering the price of a 2. The biggest problem is the 67mm diameter, which can make filters quite pricey especially circular polarizers.
If I had had enough money for a mm 2. I recommend it wholeheartedly. I got this with my D70s kit. It is an excellent bundled lens and it has served very well as an all round lens.
I have shot beautiful landscapes and portraits using this lens. It is a little soft at 70mm, but at 18mm, its a beauty. Autofocus is fast just like the other AF-S lenses and it has no problems in tracking moving subjects such as cars and bikes even on my D70s.
I can imagine it being better on more expensive bodies. This is my most used lens. It has a great range and is nicely weighted for all day use.
Image quality is very good at all focal lengths and all apertures. It gets very sharp in the f5. Autofocus is very fast and near silent.
CA is low, but can show up in high contrast areas or backlit situations. Distortion is medium barrel to very minor pincushion.
Build quality is quite good considering the price. Whenever I need a lens for general shooting or traveling, this is the lens I take.
I have read good and bad remarks about the lens mostly good, though. In any case, my Nikon is excellent in every way: I own a D and decided to run this lens through the typical battery of testing through the various focal lengths and apertures.
I did not find anything whatsoever to complain about. I also own the Nikon 50 1. Obviously the lens is slower and would prevent use in low-light conditions without flash or higher ISO settings maybe VR would be cool to have.
Trust me, if your copy is as good as mine, you will be completely happy with the I am, and I highly recommend it! I would love to have the VR, but who knows when I will ever see one as Nikon has told dealers month delays, too bad: I would love to have one of these.
Until then, I am happily shooting with my on my D as my main lens. This is the lens that came with my camera. I was never a big fan of this lens.
I needed something that would handle low-light situations better and the lens was never as sharp as I would have liked so ended up selling it.
A very respectable kit lens but nothing more. It will suit most people most of the time but if you intend on venturing beyond the cafe strip you might run into trouble.
It has a troubling amount of give extended at 70mm. This is a great medium telephoto lens. Before i bought my first camera i did tons of research and found that this particular lens always had good reviews and many people recommended it.
The quality of this lens is far better than i thought. And its very portable, its a small lens but bigger than the I think this is the best medium telephoto lens for this price.
When I made the leap to digital and I really leapt, selling my s bodies; burning my ships so to speak , I was just going to buy a D70 body, but standing in the store, I decided to get this lens so I would have some wide angle capability.
Funny, because I was only getting the D70 so I could use all my old lenses, but this lens is so ridiculously practical that I use it a lot.
I mean, really a lot. As a travel lens, I just love it. I will likely eventually get a faster wide zoom, but if I was going to be stuck somewhere for a couple of weeks and could only have one of my current lenses, this would be the one.
Received this as a kit lens with my d70s and it has been an excellent performer. Not as well constructed as a pro lens but pretty good for being plastic.
The mm focal length is a great zoom and has lots of reach for a small zoom. Couple this with a mm telephoto and you have a great set for everyday use.
The standard kit lens that came with my D70 and has served me well. I do find than now after almost 2 years of use the focus and zoom rings are getting gritty and rough.
The lens still produces sharp images and is very compact for the focal range. Still a "slow" lens when full zoomed out to I have even put a rather large "chip" into the front element along the filter ring.
Due to removing a stuck filter. The chip is horrendous looking, but the lens still performs well with no distortion or loss of image quality.
For a "cheap" Nikor lens it certainly has worked well for me. Very nice kit lens. Sharp, moderate distortion much better than Canon IS , and light.
If you like macro, look at Sigma or instead. Its optical performance is superb and it is built well enough that it can take a few bangs and bumps - I have put mine to that test accidently while mountain hiking.
It is on my D all the time because if I want to grab a camera and be able to cover almost anything with success and no lens changes, this lens is my choice.
I recently purchased this lens to upgrade my g. The , while no , delivers similar IQ with a very nice build at a quarter of the cost.
The first thing that surprised me when I purchased this lens is the build. The lens has a nice feel to it, and inspires confidence. The zoom ring and manual focus rings are nice and smooth and the manual focus override is a nice touch.
This lens really fills out the frame of the D50, and gives it a nice professional look. So how does it perform? Focus is fast, if you are not used to a real AF-S lens as I was , be prepared as this thing focuses quickly and silently.
Considering the max aperture is 3. Build quality and fit on the D70 are impecable. I even had the misfortune to have a drink spilled on mine, and it remains very functional.
This is in no way, shape or form a pro lens. However, it is a great starter for anyone entering the DSLR world and wants a flexible outdoor walkaround lens.
This is my most used lens because of its useful focal range. I traded my kit mm for this lens and the only thing I regret is not doing it sooner.
Its better build quality alone to me is worth the higher price. I have a few outdoor shots where the corners are slightly darker.
I need to stress the word "siightly. My favorite part about this lens is the AF-S. I never noticed it until I got a 50mm 1.
As mentionned before, this lens is a the perfect basic companion of the D70 - it is a sturdy, well designed lens, with all that what needs to start having fun!!
As part of the kit, it is definitely a grat advantage of the D70, especially now that prices are dropping. AF is great, optics are more than fine for a lens.
Of course, one cannot expect the quality of primes, but considering its size, price and zoom range, it is well above average!! There is quit an important amount of vignetting at 18mm ; ok, this can be easily removed through software, but one cannot use the images straight out of the camera.
I would prefer it if it could be a bit more wide angle, but well, it is an all around lens ; also, the widest settings are a bit difficult to set finely.
Will not work with film cameras Comments: This is very nice DX lens from Nikon. Using it with a film camera body will produce pictures with severe vignetting.
The mm lens has a very usable zoom range although most will probably want a more length of course, we almost always want more zoom power regardless of what lens we are using!
It is sharp, contrasty, and keeps distortion under control. Overall, a very nice lens from Nikon that I would highly recommend.
I bought mine used, for a D This one is likely to become my walk-around lens!! This is a very good "walk about" lens on a DSLR. Colors and sharpness are as good as can be expected.
The only bad thing I can think of in terms of image quality is the barrel distortion at the wide end. You really have to watch where you place the horizon in the frame or take care of it in post processing.
I sometimes miss a closer minimum focussing distance. Nothing bad to say about this lens, delivers what it promises. In good lightning results are very good.
Good value choice for midrange zoom, if you have too much money I would imagine that better can be found. However, this lens has proven to be very versital.
The range has proven itself in the field and is the only lens I carry when packpacking and hiking. My only gripe is when manual focusing and that is a common thing with most AF lenses.
For the price, this is a wonderful lens. I bought this lens with my D and am really very impressed with the images made from it. Want to encourage other commentators with actual experience.
Can you tell does the SnapBridge provide continuous location data from phone to camera and embed it to each frame? With the same sensor as the fabulous D at the heart of things, the results from the Nikon D are predictably excellent.
It may have slightly less pixels than goo. A point with two sides to it: Try using the mm F4 on D though! I use the mmF4 on the D and the images come out sharp, even with the TC 1.
Yep, the mm F4 is very sharp I used it on a DE It will never reach the quality on my D though. The field of view is mm here, and yes this is a compromise: This was shot as jpg and sharpness 6 applied in ViewNXi - not the ideal way!
But it corroborates with 13 Mpix on one and 26 Mpix on the other. This makes no sense to me. The camera manufacturers like to use dots instead of pixels, because it sounds more impressive.
So if a pixel is RGB, it has three "dots". Multiply 3 x x , and you have your big impressive number. If the pixel is WRGB, then it has four "dots".
Is it harder to see in bright daylight than that of the D? There are a lot of factors that go into display brightness other than the number of dots.
My major gripe with my D is that the screen is difficult to see in bright daylight, even when shaded with the hand. If true, this could explain why Nikon chose it as opposed to their normal reason of saving money.
This is totally a guess: A lot of testing and development goes into sensors including the on sensor pixels etc. So a huge amount of development expense went into the D-5 sensor which is not exactly the same, but closely replicated in the D which includes these extra focus related features.
My guess is that by matching number of pixels D-5 to D they could avoid re-inventing all that programming for a 24 mp aps-c sensor. Likewise, the D makes this incredible technology available in a much less expensive camera.
The D5xxx and D3xxx will not get this extra functionality so the excellent 24 mp sensors in those cameras will remain. Think of it as Nikon trying to figure out a way to spread the cost and extend the benefit of the wonderful D-5 technology over as many units and users as possible.
Why not sell the for a few hundred less, making it more accessible to general Nikon users and forget about the ? The is a slightly stripped down version and may not be that appealing to users to upgrade.
The D was never a professional camera, the series has always been considered an "enthusiast" model, not a pro.
Just my guess, either the series, or the series is done. Makes more sense to have a beginner level series? Obviously referring to the DX line.
Blink - Yeah I would have loved that too but you are suggesting would most likely be commercial suicide.
Nikon would have crunched the numbers on the cost of producing the D and factored in expected levels of demand based on the likely price they can charge or the price they want to achieve in markets and made a marketing decision accordingly.
There have been technological and cost trade offs. It is up to consumers to judge whether it represents good value. Keep in mind that not everyone starts from the same place.
I upgraded from a D People with older cameras who never switched to the might choose this camera. The D is nice, but not a viable option for most, either due to cost or lack of consumer options like a flash.
D being brought as an replacement to D D7XXX series was replacement for D If you see the market segment it will make sense. I think the approach to the iso-invariance should be reconsidered.
Noise is not the most important metric. I can smooth the noise out later in post. Even color fidelity can be corrected later using the xrite color checker or other equivalent tool.
When I evaluated my camera for iso-invariance, I found that the factor that ultimately limited the push in post was the contrast in the shadows.
Before the obvious posterizing happens in the large flat areas, low contrast detail in the shadows disappears after about a 2 stop push.
There are ways to add this contrast back. Just takes a bit of practice to get the hang of it. Hi, forget about the raw comparison shot.
I can see that the flash only fired one side of the test board. I assume the battries died in the flash on the other side?
No batteries in flash? Even worse mistake then. I just want a D with the AF and adjustable user controls of this one Weather sealing is important, especially to the types of photographers who shoot a lot of sports and wildlife.
WS would in principle be relevant, and I would accept some extra weight for it. Weight is very important for me though: I carry all photo equipment in front of my stomach and a 25kg backpack for the rest.
By the way, I have been walking in the rain regularly, and all my non-WS cameras always survived. It just felt solid to me.
The european price policy for the D is just ridiculous. The biggest price difference I have ever seen! The Kit with the mm is even worse.
Bad prices on cameras and gas but free healthcare. It balances out in the end. This week Japan and Europe made a free trade agreement.
The UK price is about right On the D the mic and headphone jacks had separate small port covers. On the D, if you are shooting video with an external mic and headphone to monitor audio, you have to open both large port covers and expose all of the ports just to use the mic and headphone jack.
It has an in-body focus motor. How would touchpad AF work? The standard multi-directional pad is better for that situation anyway.
The reviews either need to dump scores or bring in some sort of normalisation. They have become meaningless, as admitted by DPR.
I managed to read the whole review without really noticing the score ie, if you had asked me, I would not have been able to tell you what it was.
Incredible how a lower performance camera in can get almost the same votation of the higher performing NX1 2. Perhaps that would have helped samsung selling its cameras?
Who knows, perhaps not, but it would be nice to be evaluated correctly compared with other cameras reviewed here. It is what it is I guess. A mark that for some that has meaning and for others is flawed.
I put more weight on the individual categories shown in a histogram format. But still there is extensive subjectivity to the reviews.
One side is much lighter than the other. Just forget about this comparison until they reshoot the RAW test. The D is a very capable camera that could benefit from better live view tracking and a fully articulating screen.
The D got a complete upgrade, it just happens to be called the D What difference does it make if the D had been called the D and the D was called the D?
Everyone is deciding "downgrade" simply based on the name of the D XXTwnz, true it makes no difference how a new camera called. But the D is a true update to the Ds It has nothing to do with the D series only the D shares some features of the D The sun starts to come out after a long winter, flowers are blooming and bears come out of hibernation.
April was a pretty busy month in the camera industry, including some real blockbuster announcements. The winners of our "best for Simply put, these cameras are the cream of the crop right now.
Aimed at sports shooters it promises improved AF, including advanced subject recognition, along with the highest-ever rated image stabilization system.
The Nikon Z6 may not offer the incredible resolution of its sibling, the Z7, but its excellent video quality and faster performance make it an impressive camera at a considerably lower price.
These entry level cameras should be easy to use, offer good image quality and easily connect with a smartphone for sharing. Panasonic has released full details of its two pro-oriented full-frame mirrorless cameras.
While we wait to get our hands on a fully testable camera, take a look at some initial shots. The cheaper Lumix DC-S1 is geared toward photographers with serious stills and video needs, offering It lacks the impressive resolution of its sibling, but the Lumix S1 looks to offer plenty for the photographer who needs serious video and stills capabilities.
Take a look at some of our initial sample images — shot with pre-production firmware. The new 50mm 1. After being liquidated back in Bowens is back in business with the launch of its new XMT strobe.
Ricoh has announced a pair of Pentax K-mount lenses: Both lenses will be available in February. Lomography is cutting the variety from the same sheets as its 35mm version of the repurposed German cinema film stock.
SwitchPod is a new take on handheld tripods, such as the Job Gorillapod, that transforms shapes in seconds to go from handheld to freestanding.
No full frame, no way. Photo chemistry manufacturer and supplier Tetenal Europe GmbH is reportedly set to close up shop after a prolonged search for new investors failed to secure its future.
The footage shows dry ice bubbles, slime, burning metal balls and other objects filmed from varying angles, using creative lighting, slow motion and other effects.
Irix has released its latest collection of filters designed to reduce the warm glow of sodium lamps that line city streets.
Submit a News Tip! Best cameras and lenses Nikon D, speed and capability comments. Image Quality 9 Analysis: Body, Black, Base In stock. Juniour I am new in this line of photography, but was thinking of buying a D and I wont have to upgrade in the future.
StoneJack Pardon me, but serious video is manual focus only and Nikon can deliver stunning video in manual and sometimes even in autofocus modes.
Duncan D to admin: Richard Butler Could you be more specific? Great review and images. Anyone knows if the D tracks as well as the D?
Ebrahim Saadawi So if I want to use this for video: The 25 and 35mm range could be covered by the mm.
Just deep DOF and slow. Skyscape They could just hire you as their professional consultant. Duncan D The nikon d is exposed to the left instead of the right like all other cameras in the ISO variant test.
IdM photography DPReview should give separate final scores for photo and for video Nuno Saldanha agree, and we are talking about cameras, NOT camcorders, so that changes a lot your conclusions, specially when the Cons are almost all about video aspects.
Dan DeLion Hell, if you want a body with only one card slot, no grip for handling long lenses in sports applications, no Ai-s tab for using older lenses, a reduced resolution sensor, and the replacement of metal with plastic — the D is the perfect camera for you.
XXTwnz The D has all those things and more so if you need professional features then buy the professional camera.
Ross the Fidller deleted. Paul Petersen As a shooter the has some features not mentioned in summery that I think are really useful that you overlooked like the power aperture for video shooting, highlight weighted metering, face detection in OVF and touch af selection on screen.
Deliverator 16 x 2. There are various good options that will get you this wide. Samyang and Rokinon both make manual focus 14 mm primes that are much cheaper than the Nikon.
Or, there are the wide angle zooms like the Tokina , the Nikon , the Sigma , etc. Hasa The Samyang 8mm fisheye would seem like the widest wideangle possible for 4K shooting?
Photography Matters Typo watch: Viperpr Crummy video autofocus? Maybe it was a mistake. ZJ24 Can someone who shoots DSLR video professionally help me out here - I never quite understand the emphasis on autofocus with video in these reviews.
Peter Albinger I clicked on the compare mode and scrolled down to Sony. Why would that be? PeterWor Just got it last night, late, opened it up, to find that there is NO built in GPS, you either have to buy on of two Nikon accessories, or have it tethered to your smartphone.
Average User "Ultimately, we feel Nikon executed the D with near-perfection. Michael Why is there no selector to toggle between 4K and video resolutions?
Hasa I repeat myself: Doug 66 Just got back from a long trip with the D A few comments, mostly to counter items found in the review: Average User I especially like these comments because Doug66 actually had been using the camera enough to report experience with it.
Hasa A point with two sides to it: IdM photography Yep, the mm F4 is very sharp Michael The camera manufacturers like to use dots instead of pixels, because it sounds more impressive.
Average User This is totally a guess: Yossarian1 Blink - Yeah I would have loved that too but you are suggesting would most likely be commercial suicide.
Doug 66 Keep in mind that not everyone starts from the same place. Hasa Hi, forget about the raw comparison shot.
Sensor08 I just want a D with the AF and adjustable user controls of this one But that would make too much sense. Sensor08 WS would in principle be relevant, and I would accept some extra weight for it.
The D weighs g. Then again, I used to shoot with a D1 g! BlueBomberTurbo The bigger grip makes all the difference. CyeJoeBob The european price policy for the D is just ridiculous.
Ruekon This week Japan and Europe made a free trade agreement. Eloise The UK price is about right King Penguin Yes you can.
Retzius d lenses work just fine. XXTwnz It has an in-body focus motor. D lenses work fine. GabrielZ My misunderstanding, I see how it works now.
Yossarian1 It got a gold award. Anyway this scoring system is really flawed IMO. Yossarian1 It is what it is I guess. Alx XXTwnz, true it makes no difference how a new camera called.
You may also like. More about gear in this article. Best Gear of